<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Google reinvents email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/2009/06/22/google-reinvents-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/2009/06/22/google-reinvents-email/</link>
	<description>Beobachtet das Internet - Web 2.0, Ajax, Online Marketing, Usability, Best Practices etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:35:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Von: Trackback - Cheap Internation Call &#62;&#62; How to make cheap international call</title>
		<link>http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/2009/06/22/google-reinvents-email/comment-page-1/#comment-259758</link>
		<dc:creator>Trackback - Cheap Internation Call &#62;&#62; How to make cheap international call</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/?p=1652#comment-259758</guid>
		<description>,..] blog.internet-briefing.ch is one useful source of tips on this topic,..]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>,..] blog.internet-briefing.ch is one useful source of tips on this topic,..]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Walte Call</title>
		<link>http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/2009/06/22/google-reinvents-email/comment-page-1/#comment-258775</link>
		<dc:creator>Walte Call</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/?p=1652#comment-258775</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for superb post. But I had difficult time navigating past your site as I kept getting 502 bad gateway error. Just thought to let you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for superb post. But I had difficult time navigating past your site as I kept getting 502 bad gateway error. Just thought to let you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Shadab</title>
		<link>http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/2009/06/22/google-reinvents-email/comment-page-1/#comment-224365</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/?p=1652#comment-224365</guid>
		<description>Bill - I don&#039;t think they talk about an email replacement initiative. After all, as I see it, the concept is not competing against email but the way humans would communicate in a knowledge driven enterprise and in future. From my understanding, email was built for &#039;simple&#039; communication and not for knowledge sharing/dissemination - the key ingredient for a knowledge based ecosystem. Are discussion forums built on email tool ? Similarly are blogs based on email platforms? Same case is with micro-blogging services &amp; wiki&#039;s. Why are their backbone not based on &#039;email&#039;? 

Just like snail mail has least relevance in the 21st century, email will have least acceptance in knowledge centric enterprises:
- which needs continuous doping in the form of innovation, 
- which is eager to tap the (tacit) human capital to stay competitive, 
- to have a seamless culture of transparency and openness. Hence, I agree, the need &amp; time to change the model for those inclined to capitalize on their human potential. 

BTW: did Google compete with Youtube? They tried with Google-video but miserably failed. Finally they gave up and acquired youtube (like a frustrated giant) and other companies in which they were not able to compete! There are similar examples of (underdog) Microsoft and other giants too. Hence I don&#039;t think it is prudent to say that only the biggies will compete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill &#8211; I don&#8217;t think they talk about an email replacement initiative. After all, as I see it, the concept is not competing against email but the way humans would communicate in a knowledge driven enterprise and in future. From my understanding, email was built for &#8217;simple&#8217; communication and not for knowledge sharing/dissemination &#8211; the key ingredient for a knowledge based ecosystem. Are discussion forums built on email tool ? Similarly are blogs based on email platforms? Same case is with micro-blogging services &amp; wiki&#8217;s. Why are their backbone not based on &#8216;email&#8217;? </p>
<p>Just like snail mail has least relevance in the 21st century, email will have least acceptance in knowledge centric enterprises:<br />
- which needs continuous doping in the form of innovation,<br />
- which is eager to tap the (tacit) human capital to stay competitive,<br />
- to have a seamless culture of transparency and openness. Hence, I agree, the need &amp; time to change the model for those inclined to capitalize on their human potential. </p>
<p>BTW: did Google compete with Youtube? They tried with Google-video but miserably failed. Finally they gave up and acquired youtube (like a frustrated giant) and other companies in which they were not able to compete! There are similar examples of (underdog) Microsoft and other giants too. Hence I don&#8217;t think it is prudent to say that only the biggies will compete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Bill French</title>
		<link>http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/2009/06/22/google-reinvents-email/comment-page-1/#comment-224200</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internet-briefing.ch/?p=1652#comment-224200</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt; A Swiss-Indian company, Colayer started developing a platform using this concept almost 10 years ago.

There are many email replacement initiatives that started a decade or so ago, but non of them managed to replace the broad adoption that lame SMTP has achieved. Lotus Notes attempted this 20 years before Colayer and they were relatively successful in the US within enterprises. But neither company has managed to change the model.

Google&#039;s research in this field has the capacity to replace global dependency on SMTP while also getting some degree of business and enterprise adoption. But Google will ultimately lock horns with Microsoft in this segment.

--bf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; A Swiss-Indian company, Colayer started developing a platform using this concept almost 10 years ago.</p>
<p>There are many email replacement initiatives that started a decade or so ago, but non of them managed to replace the broad adoption that lame SMTP has achieved. Lotus Notes attempted this 20 years before Colayer and they were relatively successful in the US within enterprises. But neither company has managed to change the model.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s research in this field has the capacity to replace global dependency on SMTP while also getting some degree of business and enterprise adoption. But Google will ultimately lock horns with Microsoft in this segment.</p>
<p>&#8211;bf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
